2015 SX Discussion
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
Why is the FIM involved in this series again? Oh that's right. They needed supercros to legitimize themselves a few years back. We've been mocking their involvement for years, it meant literally nothing, get rid of them already.
It's pretty much like this real life example that happened to me a few years back. I renewed my license plate, but when the stickers showed up it was a shitty wet foggy winter day so I didn't put them on. Threw them in my glove box and forgot about it. Pulled over for it a few weeks later and I was like shoot, forgot to put em on after at rainy day. Officer says no big, runs my info sees I check out, I put the tags on and we both go on our merry way.
Pretty fair comparison, no? Obviously the outcome is a little different, one punishment fit the crime. One doesn't.
As fans what can we do? Get fucked, that's about it.
It's pretty much like this real life example that happened to me a few years back. I renewed my license plate, but when the stickers showed up it was a shitty wet foggy winter day so I didn't put them on. Threw them in my glove box and forgot about it. Pulled over for it a few weeks later and I was like shoot, forgot to put em on after at rainy day. Officer says no big, runs my info sees I check out, I put the tags on and we both go on our merry way.
Pretty fair comparison, no? Obviously the outcome is a little different, one punishment fit the crime. One doesn't.
As fans what can we do? Get fucked, that's about it.
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
Let's have riots.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit.
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
Lol. I'm not going to go sarcastic here though. This really does grind my gears.
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
Ouch...that sucks big ones.
-
- Posts: 4657
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:05 am
- Team: Who Knows...
- Location: Test Tracks and In N Out
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
he didnt follow the rules, he got in trouble. simple
barrington314 wrote:awood is right
Leclair wrote:My name is barking
2014 rF GNC 22nd Overall - 2014 rF 450 SX 12th - 2014 rF 450 MX 11th OverallLeclair wrote:i fuck you
2013 rF GNC 17th Overall - 2013 rF 450 SX 17th - 2013 rF 450 MX 8th - 2013 EMF French Cup Open World 6th
-
- Posts: 2315
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:48 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
Maybe a redbull/monster thing? Hmmm
Why are they suspending him just 3 weeks before Anaheim? That is just fucked up.
Why are they suspending him just 3 weeks before Anaheim? That is just fucked up.
motoxjeff#7 wrote:JLV do you ever just sit back, and say " DAMN I made this game"? lol
-
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:47 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: UK
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
The thing is, there are punishments for taking a drug without a TUE, regardless of whether you are eligible for the TUE or not. That's where your comparison is different.Phathry25 wrote: It's pretty much like this real life example that happened to me a few years back. I renewed my license plate, but when the stickers showed up it was a shitty wet foggy winter day so I didn't put them on. Threw them in my glove box and forgot about it. Pulled over for it a few weeks later and I was like shoot, forgot to put em on after at rainy day. Officer says no big, runs my info sees I check out, I put the tags on and we both go on our merry way.
Pretty fair comparison, no? Obviously the outcome is a little different, one punishment fit the crime. One doesn't.
In cycling I'm sure that a drug related ban usually dates back to the date they were caught, so it's possible that if Stewart got a 2 year ban, hypothetically of course, then the ban would start and end on the same date as this years Seattle supercross. I'm not sure if that's how it works here, though.
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
#blackracersmatterKTM57 wrote:Let's have riots.
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
Regardless, when they realize how dumb the decision was after they see how many fans they just pissed off and lost, just maybe things can be over turned. Everyone knows if there's no bubba, the racing won't be near as exciting.
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
Careers end all the time. It's shitty it had to happen how it did, but everyone will forget about him not racing by the end of sx just like it happened with Mc, Rc and Windham.
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
It's a fair comparison, not exact. Either was the punishment does not fit the crime. Weather it's JBS or RV or Kevin Windham or if it happened in cycling or whatever other sport they oversee. The punishment is overkill, that doesn't change. If the FIM is responsible for the punishment it stinks something bad. Like real fishy smelling. They bring NOTHING to the table for American supercross and motocross. Are the even involved in any other American motorcycle series?BuddyTheElf wrote:The thing is, there are punishments for taking a drug without a TUE, regardless of whether you are eligible for the TUE or not. That's where your comparison is different.
In cycling I'm sure that a drug related ban usually dates back to the date they were caught, so it's possible that if Stewart got a 2 year ban, hypothetically of course, then the ban would start and end on the same date as this years Seattle supercross. I'm not sure if that's how it works here, though.
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
I thought FIM isn't part of outdoors? How is he banned entire 2015? Or is it only FIM events for 2015?
TeamHavocRacing wrote:If I had a nickel for every time someone asked for this, I would have a whole shitload of nickels.
-
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:47 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: UK
Re: 2015 SX Discussion
They haven't actually even announced how long the ban is yet.